California dog food review has evaluated this brand for an excellent A rating. It scored 90/100 points on our scale.
Highly recommended brand.
The below NextGen Dog’s California Natural dog food review analyzes product’s ingredients and nutrition, sourcing and manufacturing, any certifications and marketing claims used.
This dog food review was hand-written by a certified veterinarian and used an evidence-based evaluation approach for accuracy.
California Natural dog food is manufactured in the USA, and all main ingredients are sourced from USA and Canada.
Table of Contents
- 1 Ingredients
- 2 Nutrient Analysis
- 3 Certifications and Claims
- 4 Other Evaluations
- 5 Summary of California Dog Food Review
The following California Natural dry dog food recipes are available:
- California Natural Chicken Meal and Rice Formula Puppy
- California Natural Lamb Meal and Rice Formula Small and Medium Breed Puppy
- California Natural Lamb Meal and Rice Formula Large Bites Adult
- California Natural Lamb Meal and Rice Formula Small Bites Adult
- California Natural Herring and Sweet Potato Formula Adult
- California Natural Brown Rice and Chicken Meal Formula Weight Management Adult
- California Natural Grain Free Salmon Meal and Peas Formula Adult
- California Natural Grain Free Kangaroo and Red Lentils Formula Adult
- California Natural Grain Free Chicken Meal Formula Adult
- California Natural Grain Free Lamb Meal Formula Adult
- California Natural Grain Free Venison and Green Lentils Formula Adult
For this NGD California dog food review, company’s California Natural Chicken Meal and Rice Formula Adult Dog Food recipe has been chosen to represent their line of dry dog foods.
California Natural dog food meets AAFCO nutrient profile requirements, which ensures adequate nutritional value for canines.
Ingredients: Chicken Meal, Brown Rice, Rice, Sunflower Oil (Preserved with Mixed Tocopherols, a Source of Vitamin E), Flaxseed, Natural Flavors, Potassium Chloride, Salt, Minerals (Zinc Proteinate, Iron Proteinate, Copper Proteinate, Manganese Proteinate, Calcium Iodate), Vitamin E Supplement, Vitamins (Betaine Hydrochloride, Vitamin A Supplement, Niacin Supplement, Calcium Pantothenate, Beta Carotene, Vitamin B12 Supplement, Vitamin D3 Supplement, Riboflavin Supplement, Pyridoxine Hydrochloride, Thiamine Mononitrate, Biotin, Folic Acid), Rosemary Extract.
Most Important Ingredients
Chicken Meal: This refers to chicken that has been ground or reduced in particle size.
Brown Rice: This is unpolished rice after kernels have been removed.
Rice: Milled rice with the husk, bran and germ removed is considered (white) rice.
White rice is less nutritionally dense than brown rice, but can be a good source of carbohydrates .
Sunflower Oil (preserved with mixed tocopherols): Sunflower oil is the only source of fat in this dog food recipe.
Any balanced commercial canine diet will contain fat, which is critical for the absorption of fat soluble vitamins.
Flaxseed: Flaxseed contains omega-3 fatty acids, lignans and both soluble and insoluble fiber.
Natural Flavor: The FDA defines natural flavor as a substance obtained from a plant or animal source.
Natural flavors can also be derived from chemicals “naturally” in a laboratory setting. The term is very vague and sources of the flavoring can be varied.
The origin of the natural flavor is not specified in this dog food. However, flavors are usually added to make a food more palatable and don’t have a large effect on the nutritional value .
Potassium Chloride: Potassium chloride can be used to lessen the amount of sodium chloride used for palatability.
Both potassium and chloride are necessary electrolytes for dog’s normal body function.
Salt’s presence in the top ten ingredients may be concerning to owners since ingredients are listed by weight. However, it is important to note that this diet has a very limited ingredient list and the actual amount of salt (0.45%) shouldn’t be of any concern.
Minerals (Zinc Proteinate, Iron Proteinate, Copper Proteinate, Manganese Proteinate, Calcium Iodate): These minerals are all important parts of a well-balanced canine diet, but how much of these minerals can be absorbed from food remains debatable [32, 33, 34, 35].
The source of vitamins is not made clear, but the levels are all appropriate for canines according to AAFCO’s guidelines.
Vitamin E Supplement: Vitamin E is an antioxidant, and it can be used as a natural food preservative as well.
Studies have repeatedly shown the benefits a diet rich in daily vitamin E [22, 23, 24, 25].
California Natural dog food has no additives listed in the ingredients.
California Natural dog food has no added problematic ingredients.
The Bottom Line on Ingredients
Overall, the ingredients in California Natural dog food are average.
California Natural dog food contains no artificial flavors, colors or preservatives.
The ingredient list is ordered by weight. Chicken meal is concentrated, and therefore at the top of the ingredient list indicates this is likely the largest contributor to protein source.
One important limitation of dog food labels is its inability to provide information on the quality of ingredients.
While the quality of the ingredients can’t be determined by the label, the ingredients themselves are all wholesome, nutritious, healthy and appear to be well-balanced.
Below is a guaranteed nutrient analysis of California Natural Chicken Meal and Rice Formula Adult Dog Food recipe.
- Protein: 21% minimum
- Fat: 11% minimum
- Carbohydrates: 42%
- Fiber: 2.5%
Calories: 3,533 kcal/kg (430 kcal/cup) calculated metabolizable energy.
Adult dog food protein content is typically in the range of 20-35% which is appropriate for most healthy dogs .
However, crude fiber listed on California Natural dog food labels are not a particularly accurate measure of actual total dietary fiber content .
Certifications and Claims
Dog food manufacturers can have their foods tested and certified to meet specific regulations.
Some companies often use obscure or undefined statements. Below, we analyze all certifications and claims made by the company for accuracy and definitions.
California Natural dog food has several certifications from various organizations including:
- ISO 9000 Quality Management System, which specifies standards for food safety
- American Institute of Baking (AIB), guaranteeing accurate processes
- USDA APHIS registration, ensuring all meat is USDA compliant
All of these certifications indicate manufacturer’s dedication to testing and safety.
On their website, California Natural dog food claims to be a very limited ingredient line of dog food that delivers superior nutrition.
Since their Chicken and Rice Formula portion of the label does not have a modifier, such as “-dinner” or “-feast,” per the FDA regulations this implies the diet is comprised of at least 70% of those ingredients.
The nutrition standards set by the AAFCO are voluntary.
The presence of a statement by the AAFCO on the dog food’s label is the most important indicator of dog food’s nutritional adequacy.
Ingredient Requirements: California Natural dog food line meets AAFCO nutrient profiles for all life stages when evaluating their diet using food composition tables of the ingredients.
All California Natural dry dog foods have an AAFCO statement on the bag.
Feeding Trials: California Natural dog food has not undergone any food trials with dogs.
Diet trials are the most stringent and costly AAFCO standard, and the highest AAFCO standard that can be met. The lack of a diet trial does not necessarily indicate that this dog food isn’t high quality.
Although the AAFCO statement claims to be adequate nutrition for all life stages, this diet may not be appropriate for puppies, especially large breed growing puppies that need very precise ratios of vitamins and minerals to calorie content.
Other factors are taken into consideration for the final assessment of this dog food brand.
“Best Use By” Date on the Label
When considering dog food’s quality control, it is important to have a “Best Use By” date present on the label to ensure proper shelf life.
California Natural dog food includes a “Best Use By” label on their packaging.
While seemingly inconsequential, the presence of this date is an important indicator of a dog food’s quality and the company’s commitment to safety.
Manufacturer and Brand
California Natural dog food is owned by Natura Pet Products, which is a part of MARS Petcare family.
Natura Pet Products also manufactures EVO dry dog foods.
MARS Petcare also manufactures the following dog food brands:
- Royal Canin
- Greenies (dog dental treats)
MARS Petcare also owns Banfield Pet Hospitals.
MARS Petcare brand is one of the largest pet food manufacturers in the world, headquartered in Brussels, Belgium with companies in more than 50 countries.
California Natural dog food is manufactured in the United States.
California Natural website confirms that the main ingredients are sourced in the USA and Canada, but doesn’t offer information for the source of the added minerals and vitamins.
Testing, Safety and Quality Control
On their website, California Natural details their testing and safety parameters.
All raw ingredients are inspected and tested, as well as all final pet food products prior to being sold.
Toxins tested for include aflatoxins, melamine and cyanuric acid.
Natura dog food brand has had recalls in the past. The most recent was in January, 2013 for the possibility of salmonella contamination. California Natural dog treats were affected by this recall.
Summary of California Dog Food Review
This brand has scored 90 points out of possible 100 points for an excellent A rating, according to our Dog Food Rating System.
California Natural Chicken Meal and Rice Adult Formula Dog Food shares many of the characteristics of a high quality dog food.
This brand does not claim any certifications, but it meets AAFCO nutrition adequacy requirements and includes a “Best Use By” date.
While ingredients listed are limited in giving insight to their overall quality, they are appropriate for dogs. There are no added artificial flavors or colors.
The manufacturer is located in the USA and undergoes standard safety testing to assure quality.
- Masayuki Funaba, Yuko Oka, Shinji Kobayashi, Masahiro Kaneko, Hiromi Yamamoto, Kazuhiko Namikawa, Tsunenori Iriki, Yoshikazu Hatano, Matanobu Abe.Evaluation of meat meal, chicken meal, and corn gluten meal as dietary sources of protein in dry cat food. Can J Vet Res. 2005 Oct; 69(4): 299–304.
- Karthik P1, Kulkarni VV, Sivakumar K. Preparation, storage stability and palatability of spent hen meal based pet food. J Food Sci Technol. 2010 Jun;47(3):330-4. doi: 10.1007/s13197-010-0053-x. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
- Funaba M1, Oka Y, Kobayashi S, Kaneko M, Yamamoto H, Namikawa K, Iriki T, Hatano Y, Abe M. Evaluation of meat meal, chicken meal, and corn gluten meal as dietary sources of protein in dry cat food. Can J Vet Res. 2005 Oct;69(4):299-304.
- Zier CE1, Jones RD, Azain MJ. Use of pet food-grade poultry by-product meal as an alternate protein source in weanling pig diets. J Anim Sci. 2004 Oct;82(10):3049-57.
- Meeker DL, Meisinger JL. COMPANION ANIMALS SYMPOSIUM: Rendered ingredients significantly influence sustainability, quality, and safety of pet food. J Anim Sci. 2015 Mar;93(3):835-47. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8524.
- Iris M. Kawauchi, Nilva K. Sakomura, Cristiana F. F. Pontieri, Aline Rebelato, Thaila C. Putarov, Euclides B. Malheiros, Márcia de O. S. Gomes, Carlos Castrillo, and Aulus C. Carciof. Prediction of crude protein digestibility of animal by-product meals for dogs by the protein solubility in pepsin method. J Nutr Sci. 2014; 3: e36. Published online 2014 Sep 30. doi: 10.1017/jns.2014.32
- K. Jayathilakan, Khudsia Sultana, K. Radhakrishna, A. S. Bawa. Utilization of byproducts and waste materials from meat, poultry and fish processing industries: a review. J Food Sci Technol. 2012 Jun; 49(3): 278–293. Published online 2011 Feb 20. doi: 10.1007/s13197-011-0290-7
- Tian S1, Nakamura K, Kayahara H. Analysis of phenolic compounds in white rice, brown rice, and germinated brown rice. J Agric Food Chem. 2004 Jul 28;52(15):4808-13.
- Liu S1, Stampfer MJ, Hu FB, Giovannucci E, Rimm E, Manson JE, Hennekens CH, Willett WC. Whole-grain consumption and risk of coronary heart disease: results from the Nurses’ Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999 Sep;70(3):412-9.
- Ryan EP. Bioactive food components and health properties of rice bran. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2011 Mar 1;238(5):593-600. doi: 10.2460/javma.238.5.593.
- Girón MD1, Mataix FJ, Faus MJ, Suárez MD. Effect of long-term feeding olive and sunflower oils on fatty acid composition and desaturation activities of liver microsomes. Biochem Int. 1989 Sep;19(3):645-56.
- Campbell KL1, Dorn GP. Effects of oral sunflower oil and olive oil on serum and cutaneous fatty acid concentrations in dogs. Res Vet Sci. 1992 Sep;53(2):172-8.
- Mekki N1, Charbonnier M, Borel P, Leonardi J, Juhel C, Portugal H, Lairon D. Butter differs from olive oil and sunflower oil in its effects on postprandial lipemia and triacylglycerol-rich lipoproteins after single mixed meals in healthy young men. J Nutr. 2002 Dec;132(12):3642-9.
- Smith CE1, Freeman LM, Rush JE, Cunningham SM, Biourge V. Omega-3 fatty acids in Boxer dogs with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. J Vet Intern Med. 2007 Mar-Apr;21(2):265-73.
- Watson TD. Diet and skin disease in dogs and cats. J Nutr. 1998 Dec;128(12 Suppl):2783S-2789S.
- Mooney MA1, Vaughn DM, Reinhart GA, Powers RD, Wright JC, Hoffman CE, Swaim SF, Baker HJ. Evaluation of the effects of omega-3 fatty acid-containing diets on the inflammatory stage of wound healing in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 1998 Jul;59(7):859-63.
- Brown SA1, Brown CA, Crowell WA, Barsanti JA, Allen T, Cowell C, Finco DR. Beneficial effects of chronic administration of dietary omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in dogs with renal insufficiency. J Lab Clin Med. 1998 May;131(5):447-55.
- Freeman LM. Beneficial effects of omega-3 fatty acids in cardiovascular disease. J Small Anim Pract. 2010 Sep;51(9):462-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2010.00968.x. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
- Roush JK1, Dodd CE, Fritsch DA, Allen TA, Jewell DE, Schoenherr WD, Richardson DC, Leventhal PS, Hahn KA. Multicenter veterinary practice assessment of the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on osteoarthritis in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2010 Jan 1;236(1):59-66. doi: 10.2460/javma.236.1.59.
- Gross KL1, Bollinger R, Thawnghmung P, Collings GF. Effect of three different preservative systems on the stability of extruded dog food subjected to ambient and high temperature storage. J Nutr. 1994 Dec;124(12 Suppl):2638S-2642S.
- John W. Hilton. Antioxidants: function, types and necessity of inclusion in pet foods. Can Vet J. 1989 Aug; 30(8): 682–684.
- Packer L1. Interactions among antioxidants in health and disease: vitamin E and its redox cycle. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1992 Jun;200(2):271-6.
- Gey KF1. Vitamins E plus C and interacting conutrients required for optimal health. A critical and constructive review of epidemiology and supplementation data regarding cardiovascular disease and cancer. Biofactors. 1998;7(1-2):113-74.
- Rock CL1, Jacob RA, Bowen PE. Update on the biological characteristics of the antioxidant micronutrients: vitamin C, vitamin E, and the carotenoids. J Am Diet Assoc. 1996 Jul;96(7):693-702; quiz 703-4.
- Valk EE1, Hornstra G. Relationship between vitamin E requirement and polyunsaturated fatty acid intake in man: a review. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2000 Mar;70(2):31-42.
- Rees CA1, Bauer JE, Burkholder WJ, Kennis RA, Dunbar BL, Bigley KE. Effects of dietary flax seed and sunflower seed supplementation on normal canine serum polyunsaturated fatty acids and skin and hair coat condition scores. Vet Dermatol. 2001 Apr;12(2):111-7.
- Purushothaman D1, Yvonne Brown W, Wu SB, Vanselow B. Evaluation of breed effects on n-3 PUFA metabolism with dietary flaxseed oil supplementation in dogs. Br J Nutr. 2011 Oct;106 Suppl 1:S139-41. doi: 10.1017/S0007114511000523.
- Bauer JE1, Dunbar BL, Bigley KE. Dietary flaxseed in dogs results in differential transport and metabolism of (n-3) polyunsaturated fatty acids. J Nutr. 1998 Dec;128(12 Suppl):2641S-2644S.
- Kadri Koppel, Michael Gibson, Sajid Alavi, and Greg Aldrich. The Effects of Cooking Process and Meat Inclusion on Pet Food Flavor and Texture Characteristics. Animals (Basel). 2014 Jun; 4(2): 254–271. Published online 2014 May 23. doi: 10.3390/ani4020254
- Chandler ML. Pet food safety: sodium in pet foods. Top Companion Anim Med. 2008 Aug;23(3):148-53. doi: 10.1053/j.tcam.2008.04.008.
- Stookey GK1, Warrick JM, Miller LL. Effect of sodium hexametaphosphate on dental calculus formation in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 1995 Jul;56(7):913-8.
- Dillitzer N1, Becker N, Kienzle E. Intake of minerals, trace elements and vitamins in bone and raw food rations in adult dogs. Br J Nutr. 2011 Oct;106 Suppl 1:S53-6. doi: 10.1017/S0007114511002765.
- Alomar D1, Hodgkinson S, Abarzúa D, Fuchslocher R, Alvarado C, Rosales E. Nutritional evaluation of commercial dry dog foods by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2006 Jun;90(5-6):223-9.
- Kastenmayer P1, Czarnecki-Maulden GL, King W. Mineral and trace element absorption from dry dog food by dogs, determined using stable isotopes. J Nutr. 2002 Jun;132(6 Suppl 2):1670S-2S.
- Gagné JW1, Wakshlag JJ, Center SA, Rutzke MA, Glahn RP. Evaluation of calcium, phosphorus, and selected trace mineral status in commercially available dry foods formulated for dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2013 Sep 1;243(5):658-66. doi: 10.2460/javma.243.5.658.
- Wannemacher RW Jr, McCoy JR. Determination of optimal dietary protein requirements of young and old dogs. J Nutr. 1966 Jan;88(1):66-74.
- Butterwick RF1, Markwell PJ, Thorne CJ. Effect of level and source of dietary fiber on food intake in the dog. J Nutr. 1994 Dec;124(12 Suppl):2695S-2700S.
- Koppel K1, Monti M2, Gibson M3, Alavi S4, Donfrancesco BD5, Carciofi AC6. The Effects of Fiber Inclusion on Pet Food Sensory Characteristics and Palatability. Animals (Basel). 2015 Feb 16;5(1):110-25. doi: 10.3390/ani5010110.
- Kadri Koppel, Mariana Monti,2 Michael Gibson,3 Sajid Alavi,3 Brizio Di Donfrancesco, Aulus Cavalieri Carciofi. The Effects of Fiber Inclusion on Pet Food Sensory Characteristics and Palatability. Animals (Basel). 2015 Mar; 5(1): 110–125. Published online 2015 Feb 16. doi: 10.3390/ani5010110
- de-Oliveira LD1, Takakura FS, Kienzle E, Brunetto MA, Teshima E, Pereira GT, Vasconcellos RS, Carciofi AC. Fibre analysis and fibre digestibility in pet foods–a comparison of total dietary fibre, neutral and acid detergent fibre and crude fibre. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2012 Oct;96(5):895-906. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2011.01203.x. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
- Farcas AK1, Larsen JA, Fascetti AJ. Evaluation of fiber concentration in dry and canned commercial diets formulated for adult maintenance or all life stages of dogs by use of crude fiber and total dietary fiber methods. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2013 Apr 1;242(7):936-40. doi: 10.2460/javma.242.7.936.
- Verlinden A1, Hesta M, Millet S, Janssens GP. Food allergy in dogs and cats: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2006;46(3):259-73.
- Leistra MH1, Markwell PJ, Willemse T. Evaluation of selected-protein-source diets for management of dogs with adverse reactions to foods. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2001 Nov 15;219(10):1411-4.